Probability and Randomness
Simulate how two losing games can combine to make a winning one. Adjust the probabilities and parameters below to see the paradox in action.
Load these examples to see different scenarios of Parrondo's Paradox.
This scenario demonstrates that playing only the biased Game A consistently leads to a loss over time.
P(A): 0.495, P(B1): 0.745, P(B2): 0.095
M: 3, Capital: 100, Games: 500, Strategy: A
This shows that Game B, despite its high-winning state, is also a losing game overall when played exclusively.
P(A): 0.495, P(B1): 0.745, P(B2): 0.095
M: 3, Capital: 100, Games: 500, Strategy: B
By alternating the two losing games in an 'AABB' sequence, a winning outcome is achieved. This is the core of the paradox.
P(A): 0.495, P(B1): 0.745, P(B2): 0.095
M: 3, Capital: 100, Games: 500, Strategy: AABB
Even a random alternation between Game A and Game B can lead to a winning outcome, highlighting the paradox's robustness.
P(A): 0.495, P(B1): 0.745, P(B2): 0.095
M: 3, Capital: 100, Games: 500, Strategy: Random